USDT live
Supply 112.4B +0.8%
Tron share 53.2%
ETH share 38.4%
TRC20 gas $0.95 -2.1%
ERC20 gas $4.20
24h volume $48.2B
English · 中文

Korea Advances Stablecoin Legislation and Institutional Market Access in Parallel: Key Milestones for U-Card Users

2026-07-24

Kim Seong-jin (transliteration), head of the Virtual Assets Division at Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC), confirmed at a National Assembly session that the government is advancing two tracks in parallel: Stage 2 legislation of the Digital Asset Basic Act, which includes stablecoin rules, and a plan for institutional investors to enter the virtual asset market. According to Tokenpost, the FSC’s policy is to complete digital asset legislation within the year; once institutional market access is finalized, the 2017 administrative-guidance ban on financial institutions holding shares in virtual asset companies could also be lifted this year. This signals a clear loosening of an administrative red line that has persisted since 2017.

Editorial Take: What Actually Changes for Korean U-Card Users

Let’s start with the conclusion—at this stage, this news does not change how you use the card in your hand. It’s “upstream” news: it affects whether stablecoins gain legal recognition under Korean law, whether a won-denominated stablecoin can be issued, and whether Korean institutions can legally hold exchange shares. It does not directly touch card application, top-up, or spending workflows.

That said, mid-term implications differ by scenario:

In other words, this is not an action window right now—it’s an observation window.

Historical Comparison: Against MiCAR and Japan’s Stablecoin Framework

Placing this within the Asia-Pacific and EU regulatory timeline makes the picture clearer.

One key distinction: MiCAR and Japan both set rules first, then addressed institutional entry; Korea is this time advancing legislation and institutional market access on parallel tracks, a more aggressive pace that also means the details remain far from settled.

Regulatory and Compliance Boundaries: Where Things Stand Now

For usdtcard.net readers, it’s worth being precise about the boundaries. Korea’s current situation is:

It’s worth noting that usdtcard.net’s compliance section currently covers 8 jurisdictions including Japan, the EU, Hongkong, and Singapore, but does not yet have a standalone page for Korea. Korean users may refer to the Japan compliance guide, whose regulatory approach is somewhat closer, as a reference framework—but note that the two countries’ laws are not interchangeable; Korea’s official FSC bill should be treated as authoritative.

Key Milestones Worth Watching

  1. Publication of the Stage 2 draft bill—the FSC has committed to “completing this within the year”; the release of draft text is the first substantive signal, with particular attention to the scope of eligible stablecoin issuers.
  2. Whether the shareholding ban is formally lifted—if lifted, banks and securities firms may be able to enter the stablecoin and virtual asset business.
  3. Whether a won-denominated stablecoin issuer emerges—this is the direct evidence for whether Korea is heading toward a “licensed institutions only” model.
  4. The sequencing between institutional market access and legislation—whether the two tracks truly move “in parallel,” or one gets delayed, will determine the actual timeline.

Editorial Recommendations

In short: this is news worth marking on your calendar, but not worth acting on tonight.