USDT live
Supply 112.4B +0.8%
Tron share 53.2%
ETH share 38.4%
TRC20 gas $0.95 -2.1%
ERC20 gas $4.20
24h volume $48.2B
English · 中文

Four Wall Street Banks Secretly Form 'The Bridge' Alliance Against Stablecoins: What Should USDT Card Users Think

2026-06-06

According to a June 5 report from Spanish-language outlet CriptoNoticias, four major US banks are secretly advancing an internally codenamed stablecoin competitor project called “The Bridge,” with the goal of expanding across the entire US banking system by 2027. The report does not name the specific banks. The project is positioned as a clearing/issuance alliance led by traditional financial institutions, designed to counter the influence of private stablecoins such as Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC). This is not an isolated move — it comes against the backdrop of the US GENIUS Act stablecoin legislation taking effect, and widespread concern within the banking industry about deposits flowing out into stablecoins.

Real-world impact on USDT card users: near zero (short term)

Let’s state the conclusion up front: if you’re currently using a USDT-funded virtual card, this news won’t change any of your day-to-day operations over the next 7, 30, or even 90 days.

That’s because The Bridge and USDT virtual cards sit at different points in the value chain. The logic of a USDT virtual card is: you load ₮ into an issuer (such as MPCard or Bybit Card), and the issuer converts USDT to fiat on the back end, then routes spending through the Visa/Mastercard network. What The Bridge is trying to do is have banks issue their own “compliant stablecoin,” competing for USDT/USDC’s market share as a settlement and value-storage medium — not competing directly with any particular card.

Broken down by use case:

Historical comparison: how this differs from 2023 and 2024

Placing The Bridge on a timeline helps clarify its real weight.

Compared with banks “rejecting crypto businesses” in 2023 (the Operation Chokepoint 2.0 controversy): that wave saw banks passively pulling back services from crypto companies — a defensive, avoidance-driven stance. The Bridge, by contrast, is banks actively entering the arena — they no longer just want to keep stablecoins out the door, they want to issue one themselves. This marks a fundamental shift in posture.

Compared with USDC’s brief depeg in 2023 (the Silicon Valley Bank incident): that episode exposed the risk of stablecoin reserves being parked in traditional banks. Ironically, The Bridge moves in the opposite direction — having banks become the issuers themselves, so that in theory reserves and issuance share the same source. But this also introduces a new kind of centralization risk, the inverse of the “private stablecoin + on-chain verifiable” model USDT card users are used to.

Compared with the SEC’s 2024 lawsuit against Coinbase: that was a regulator applying pressure through litigation, whereas The Bridge is a market participant fighting back with a product. One is top-down, the other bottom-up — but both point toward the same outcome: the stablecoin sector is moving from “wild growth” into a phase where incumbents carve up the market.

Compliance perspective: where the line currently sits

The compliance picture here is clear: under the GENIUS Act framework, bank-issued stablecoins are explicitly encouraged — the legislation itself creates a legitimate channel for regulated institutions to issue payment stablecoins. So The Bridge isn’t operating in a gray area; it’s on a track regulators welcome.

But the boundary that actually matters to USDT card users isn’t in the US — it’s in whatever region your card is issued from. If you mainly spend in Asia-Pacific, licensing progress covered in Hong Kong compliance essentials and Singapore compliance essentials is more practically relevant to you than this Wall Street alliance. Even if US bank-issued stablecoins roll out nationwide by 2027, they’re unlikely to directly reach Asia-Pacific retail users — and that’s precisely the moat that Asia-Pacific-route cards like the one covered in the MPCard review hold.

To be clear: no regulatory action currently requires USDT holders or USDT card users to change anything. The Bridge is still at the “internal codename plus media leak” stage — there hasn’t even been an official confirmation yet.

Key milestones worth watching

Editorial recommendation

Users holding MPCard (including the Asia Elite variant) or Bybit Card: no action needed. This news doesn’t change your top-up, spending, or withdrawal flow, nor does it affect card fees.

Users relying mainly on USDC for US-region subscriptions: no need to act now, but add “monitor USDC issuer announcements” to your long-term watchlist. If you want a backup plan for US-region subscriptions, see the 2026 Top 5 recommended cards and the lowest-fee card comparison to avoid relying on a single stablecoin.

Users planning to apply for a new card: don’t delay your decision because of The Bridge. An alliance that won’t launch until 2027 — and whose member banks aren’t even publicly named yet — isn’t a variable that should factor into today’s card choice. Choosing a card based on where you actually spend matters far more than chasing this story.

In one line: The Bridge is an important long-term signal for the stablecoin industry’s shifting landscape, but for the USDT card in your hand right now, it’s a “note it down, don’t act on it” item.

— This article is based on editorial judgment drawn from the CriptoNoticias report and publicly available legislative information. It does not constitute investment or compliance advice.