USDT live
Supply 112.4B +0.8%
Tron share 53.2%
ETH share 38.4%
TRC20 gas $0.95 -2.1%
ERC20 gas $4.20
24h volume $48.2B
English · 中文

US House Releases 7 Crypto Tax Discussion Drafts, Including Stablecoin Exemption Clause — Practical Impact for USDT Card Users

2026-06-06

According to Japanese crypto media outlet CoinPost’s report, the U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means has released 7 discussion drafts on cryptocurrency taxation, covering separate legislative topics such as a stablecoin transaction exemption threshold, staking, mining, and wash-sale rules, with plans to review them at a hearing on June 9. The most closely watched item is a clause reportedly included in the drafts that would establish a de minimis exemption for stablecoin transactions.

Editor’s note: primary source unverified. As of publication, details such as the “7 drafts” and the “June 9 hearing” have only been found in CoinPost’s Japanese-language report. We have not yet located the corresponding draft text or a press release link on the official website of the House Committee on Ways and Means. Readers should treat this article as an interpretation of a secondhand report; the actual provisions will be governed by the officially published text. The impact assessment below is premised on “if this report is accurate.”

Editorial Take: What Does This Mean for the USDT Card in Your Wallet?

Let’s first draw the boundary around the conclusion: a discussion draft is not law, and not even a formal bill. It’s a text committees use to solicit feedback and lay groundwork for a hearing—it’s still several steps away from taking effect: a formal proposal, votes in both chambers, and a presidential signature. Treat it as a “signal of legislative intent,” not “next month’s tax bill.”

For card usage specifically, this splits into two groups:

1. US tax residents. If a de minimis exemption for stablecoin transactions is enacted, the most direct beneficiaries are people using USDC/USDT for everyday small purchases. Under current US rules, every instance of converting stablecoin to fiat or spending via card could theoretically trigger a taxable event (capital gains/loss), even for amounts of just a few dollars. An exemption threshold could eliminate this compliance noise—the burden of tracking cost basis for something as small as buying a cup of coffee. For users holding cards like Coinbase Card or BitPay Card, which target the US market through compliant channels, this would be a medium-to-long-term positive.

2. Asia-Pacific and other non-US tax residents. This is where most usdtcard.net readers fall. US domestic tax law does not change your tax obligations, nor does it affect whether you can use your card. If you’re using an Asia-Pacific-routed virtual Visa like MPCard’s Asia Elite, this news is practically irrelevant to you—whether your transactions are taxable depends on the rules of your own jurisdiction, not the US IRS.

Timeline expectations:

Historical Comparison: What’s Similar, What’s Different

The closest precedent is the series of crypto tax amendments the US Congress attempted to advance between 2022 and 2023—including proposals for a de minimis exemption for crypto transactions. Most of those versions stalled at the committee level and never completed the legislative process. Similarity: both attempts try to solve the “every transaction must be reported” pain point for stablecoin/crypto micropayments. Difference: this time, the Ways and Means Committee is proactively bundling 7 drafts together with a coordinated hearing—a higher degree of organization, suggesting tax-related legislation has been folded into a more systematic agenda.

Another comparison point is the multi-round tug-of-war over SEC regulatory authority in 2024—that battle was about “who regulates,” while these drafts are about “how to tax.” The two are different in nature: regulatory classification affects whether card issuers can operate compliantly, while tax rules affect users’ reporting costs. For end users, changes to tax rules land more directly on “how much time I spend on bookkeeping each year.”

Compliance Boundaries: What’s Actually Allowed Right Now

It’s worth clarifying that this discussion concerns tax treatment, not legality. Using stablecoins or holding a USDT card has never been illegal in the US; the dispute has always been over how it’s measured for tax purposes.

For readers in mainland China: regardless of how US tax law changes, domestic regulatory positions on crypto-related activities have not loosened—see our Mainland China compliance note for related risks. Hong Kong users operate under a separate framework; see the Hong Kong compliance guide—Hong Kong has an independent licensing pathway for stablecoins and virtual asset service providers, unaffected by US legislation.

To draw the line in one sentence: this US draft = a tax-filing convenience issue for US tax residents; it is not a question of global card-usage legality.

Milestones Worth Watching Next

Editorial Recommendations

What’s actually worth your time next month isn’t the wording of this draft, but whether it can move from “7 scattered documents” to “a bill that can actually be voted on”—until that step happens, nothing changes for the card in your wallet.